Personas mayores y agendas de amigabilidad en diferentes contextos territoriales: Identificación de desafíos en clave de participación social

Agile Ageing Alliance (2019). Neigbourhoods for future. Creating a brighter future for our older selves. https://www.housinglin.org.uk/_assets/Resources/Housing/OtherOrganisation/Neighbourhoods-of-the-Future-2019.pdf

Ahmed, K., Rojo-Pérez, F., Fernández-Mayoralas, G., Forjaz, M. J. y Martinez-Martin, P. (2015). Associative participation of older adults and subjective quality of life: exploring self-selection bias. Ageing & Society, 35(7), 1343-1363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1400021X

Alley, D., Liebig, P., Pynoos, J., Banerjee, T. y Choi, I. H. (2007). Creating Elder-Friendly Communities. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1-2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v49n01_01

Atkins, M. T. (2019). Creating age-friendly cities: prioritizing interventions with Q-methodology. International Planning Studies. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1608164

Atkinson, P. y Coffey, A. (2004). Analysing documentary realities. Qualitative research, 3, 77-92.

Au, A., Lai, D. W. L., Yip, H., Chan, S., Lai, S., Chaudhury, H., Scharlach, A. y Leeson, G. (2020). Sense of Community Mediating Between Age-Friendly Characteristics and Life Satisfaction of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00086

Ayuntamiento de Madrid (2015). Madrid ciudad amigable con las personas mayores. Madrid: Área de Equidad, Derechos Sociales y Empleo, Ayuntamiento de Madrid. https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Madrid-Ciudad-Amigable-con-las-Personas-Mayores.-Diagn%C3%B3stico-de-situaci%C3%B3n.pdf

Barnes, M. (1999). Users as Citizens: Collective Action and the Local Governance of Welfare. Social Policy y Administration, 33(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00132

Bass, S., Caro, F. y Chen, Y.-P. (1993). Achieving a productive aging society. Westport, CT.: Auburn House.

Bhuyan, M. R., Lane, A. P., Moogoor, A., Mocnik, Š. y Yuen, B. (2020). Meaning of age-friendly neighbourhood: An exploratory study with older adults and key informants in Singapore. Cities, 107, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102940

Bigonnesse, C., Beaulieu, M. y Garon, S. (2014). Meaning of home in later life as a concept to understand older adults’ housing needs: Results from the 7 age-friendly cities pilot project in Québec. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 28(4), 357-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2014.930367

Blakey, J. y Clews, J. (2020). Knowing, Being and Co-Constructing an Age-Friendly Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 9136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239136

Boudiny, K. (2013). Active ageing’: from empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing & Society, 33(6), 1077-1098. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0144686X1200030X

Brossoie, N. y Burn, D. (2020). What Makes a City a Good Place to Live and Grow Old? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40 (12), 1666-1677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820957149

Buffel, T. (2018). Social research and co-production with older people: Developing age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Studies, 44, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.012

Buffel, T., De Donder, L., Phillipson, C., Dury, S., De Witte, N. y Verte, D. (2013). Social participation among older adults living in medium-sized cities in Belgium: the role of neighbourhood perceptions. Health Promotion International, 29(4), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dat009

Buffel, T., Handler, S. y Phillipson, C. (2018). Age-friendly cities and communities: A manifesto for change. Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective, 273-288.

Buffel, T. y James, H. (Aceptado/en prensa). Working with older people as co-researchers in developing age-friendly communities. Geron, 21(2).

Buffel, T. y Phillipson, C. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical social policy, 32(4), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457

Buffel, T. y Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be ‘age-friendly cities’? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016

Buffel, T. y Phillipson, C. (2018). A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda A Manifesto for the Age Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 30(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414

Buffel, T., Rémillard-Boilard, S., Walsh, K., McDonald, B., Smetcoren, A. S. y Donder, L. D. (2020). Age-Friendly Approaches and Old-Age Exclusion: A Cross-City Analysis. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 14(2), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.1470

Buffel, T., Skyrme, J. y Phillipson, C. (2017). Connecting Research with Social Responsibility: Developing ‘Age-Friendly’ Communities in Manchester, UK. En University Social Responsibility and Quality of Life (pp. 99-120). Singapur: Springer.

Bukov, A., Maas, I. y Lampert, T. (2002). Social Participation in Very Old Age: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Findings From BASE. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 57(6), 510-517. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.6.P510

Callejo, J. (2009). Introducción a las técnicas sociológicas de análisis de documentos. En Callejo, J., del Val, C., Gutiérrez, J. y Viedma, A. (Eds.), Introducción a las técnicas de investigación social (pp. 213-243). Madrid: Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces.

Cao, Q., Dabelko-Schoeny, H. I., White, K. M. y Choi, M.-S. (2020). Age-friendly communities and perceived disconnectedness: The role of built environment and social engagement. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(9), 937-948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319865421

Carey, M. (2019). Some limits and political implications of participation within health and social care for older adults. Ageing & Society, 39(8), 1691-1708. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0144686X18000193

Corbin, J. y Strauss, A. (2008). Strategies for qualitative data analysis. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3ª ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Del Barrio, E., Marsillas, S., Buffel, T., Smetcoren, A. S. y Sancho, M. (2018). From Active Aging to Active Citizenship: The Role of (Age) Friendliness. Social Sciences, 7(8), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080134

Del Barrio, E., Marsillas, S. y Sancho, M. (2018). Del envejecimiento activo a la ciudadanía activa: el papel de la amigabilidad. Aula Abierta, 47(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.47.1.2018.37-44

Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (2002). The qualitative inquiry reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Domínguez-Párraga, L. (2019). Neighborhood Influence: A Qualitative Study in Cáceres, an Aspiring Age-Friendly City. Social Sciences, 8(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8060195

Doran, P. y Buffel, T. (2018). Translating Research into Action: involving older people in co-producing knowledge about age-friendly neighbourhood interventions. Working with Older People, 22(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-11-2017-0033

Dutka, G., Gawron, G. y Rojek-Adamek, P. (2021). Creativity based on new technologies in design of age-friendly cities: Polish seniors about their needs-research reflection. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13592

Équipe de recherche MADA-Québec (2020). Guide d’accompagnement pour la réalisation de la démarche Municipalité amie des aînés. Québec: Secrétariat aux aînés du ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux.

Ezquerra, S., Pérez-Salanova, M., Pla, M. y Subirats, J. (2016). Edades en transición. Envejecer en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Ariel.

Falanga, R., Cebulla, A., Principi, A. y Socci, M. (2021). The Participation of Senior Citizens in Policy-Making: Patterning Initiatives in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010034

Fitzgerald, K. G. y Caro, F. G. (2014). An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.201 4.860786

Flores, R., Caballer, A. y Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an Age-Friendly City and Its Effect on Life Satisfaction: A Two-Stage Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245073

Formosa, M. (2012). Four decades of Universities of the Third Age: past, present, future. Ageing & Society, 34(1), 42-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0144686X12000797

Foster, L. y Walker, A. (2015). Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu028

Fundación Matias (2015). Estrategia Vasca de envejecimiento activo 2015-2020. https://www.matiainstituto.net/es/proyectos-de-investigacion/proyectos/estrategia-vasca-de-envejecimiento-activo-2015-2020

Gardiner, C., Geldenhuys, G. y Goot, M. (2018). Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health and social care in the community, 26(2), 147-157.

Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A. y Laliberté, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging & social policy, 26(1-2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2014.854583

Garon, S., Paris, M. y Veil, A. (2020). Guide d’accompagnement pour la réalisation de la démarche Municipalité amie des aînés (2ª édition). Québec: Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2019/19-830-22W.pdf

Giacomini, A. y Lefebvre, P.-O. (2018). Spécificités françaises de la démarche Villes amies des aînés: Une dynamique politique soutenue par le Réseau francophone. Retraite et societe, 79(1), 137-146.

Gibney, S., Zhang, M. y Brennan, C. (2020). Age-friendly environments and psychosocial wellbeing: A study of older urban residents in Ireland. Aging & Mental Health, 24(12), 2022-2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1652246

Gouvernament du Québec (2018). Un Québec pour tous les âges. Le plan d’action. Québec. https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/ainee/F-5234-MSSS-18.pdf

Gobierno del País Vasco. Departamento de Empleo y Políticas Sociales (2015). Estrategia Vasca de envejecimiento activo 2015-2020. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco. https://bideoak2.euskadi.eus/2019/02/18/news_52081/estrategia_vasca_de_envejecimiento_activo.pdf

Golant, S. M. (2014). Age-friendly communities: Are we expecting too much? IRPP. Insight, 2(5), 1-19.

Gosende, E. E. (2009). Metodología de la Investigación y Estadística Descriptiva. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Argentina.

Gramberger, M. (2001). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. París: OECD Publishing.

Guba, E. G. y Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3ª ed. (pp. 191-215). Londres: Sage.

Guérin, D. y Moulaert, T. (2018). Accompagner la mise en œuvre des démarches Municipalités amies des aînés au Québec. Retraite et société, 79, 107-111.

Gutiérrez, E., Osorio, P., Rios, P. y Wilson, C. (2006). Adultez Mayor Contexto+ Subtexto. Antología de textos gerontológicos. Hacia la construcción de una nueva agenda. Observatorio Social del Envejecimiento y la Vejez en Chile-Proyecto Anillo CONICYT, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales-Universidad de Chile.

Gyarmati, G. (1992). Reflexiones teóricas y metodológicas en torno a la participación. Estudios Sociales, 73.

Hammersley, M. y Aatkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía: métodos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.

Han, J., Chan, E. H. W., Qian, Q. K. y Yung, E. H. K. (2021). Achieving Sustainable Urban Development with an Ageing Population: An «Age-Friendly City and Community» Approach. Sustainability, 13(15), 8614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158614

Hewson, J. A., Kwan, C., Shaw, M. y Lai, D. W. L. (2018). Developing Age-Friendly Social Participation Strategies: Service Providers’ Perspectives about Organizational and Sector Readiness for Aging Baby Boomers. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 42(3), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2017.1398034

Higgs, P. y Gilleard, C. (2010). Generational conflict, consumption and the ageing welfare state in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 30(8), 1439-1451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000425

Hoiman, D. y Walker, A. (2021). Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses. European Journal of Ageing, 18(2), 239-255.

Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía (2021). Indicadores Andalucía y Provincias. Andalucía. Población y hogares. https://www.ieca.junta-andalucia.es/28Febrero

Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales (2017). Las personas mayores en España. Datos estadísticos estatales y por comunidades autónomas. Informe 2016. Madrid: IMSERSO. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. https://www.imserso.es/imserso_01/documentacion/ estadisticas/informe_ppmm/index.htm

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2021). Proporción de personas mayores de cierta edad por comunidad autónoma. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=1451

—(2021). Proporción de personas mayores de cierta edad por provincia. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=​1488#!tabs-grafico

Íñiguez, L. (1999). Investigación y evaluación cualitativa: bases teóricas y conceptuales. Atención Primaria, 23(8), 496-502.

Ivan, L., Beu, D. y Van Hoof, J. (2020). Smart and age-friendly cities in Romania: An overview of public policy and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5202. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145202

Iwarson, S. (2005). A long-term perspective on person-environment fit and

ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. The Geronto­logist, 45(3), 327-336.

Joy, M. (2021). Neoliberal rationality and the age friendly cities and communities program: Reflections on the Toronto case. Cities, 108, 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102982

Junta de Andalucía, Consejería para la Igualdad y el Bienestar Social (2010).

Libro blanco del envejecimiento activo en Andalucía. Confederación

Salud Mental España. https://consaludmental.org/centro-documen­tacion/libro-blanco-envejecimiento-activo-andalucia/

Fantova, F. (2001). La gestión de organizaciones no lucrativas. Herramientas para la intervención social. Madrid: CCS.

Kalache, A. y Kickbuch, I. (1997). A global strategy for healthy ageing. World Health, 50(4), 4-5.

Katz, S. y Calasanti, T. (2015). Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it «appeal more than it illuminates»? The Gerontologist, 55(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu027

Kending, H., Elias, A. M., Majwijiw, P. y Anstey, K. (2014). Developing age-friendly Cities and Communities in Australia. Journal of Aging and Health, 26(8), 1390-1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314532687

King, A. C., King, D. K., Banchoff, A., Solomonov, S., Ben Natann, O., Hua, J., y Porter, M. M. (2020). Employing participatory citizen science methods to promote age-friendly environments worldwide. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051541

Krippendorf, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido: teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.

Labuschagne, A. (2003). Qualitative research: Airy fairy or fundamental. The qualitative report, 8(1), 100-103.

Lawler, K. (2015). Age-friendly communities: Go big or go home. Public Policy y Aging Report, 25(1), 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/pru051

Levasseur, M., Lussier-Therrien, M., Biron, M. L., Raymond, É., Castonguay, J., Naud, D., Fortier, M., Sévigny, A., Houde, S. y Tremblay, L. (2021). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: Update, co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition, and exploration of the influence of international health policies. Publicación en línea.

Levasseur, M., Richard, L., Gauvin, L. y Raymond, E. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science y Medicine, 71(12), 2141-2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041

Litwin, H. (2012). Physical activity, social network type, and depressive symptoms in late life: An analysis of data from the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project. Aging & mental health, 16(5), 608-616.

López, J. y Díaz, M. D. (2021). El aumento de personas mayores solas en Andalucía y en España. Colección Actualidad. Centro de Estudios Andaluces, 95. https://www.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/publicaciones/n-95-el-aumento-de-personas-mayores-solas-en-andalucia-y-en-espana

Lui, C. W., Everingham, J. A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M. y Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x

MacGarry, P. y Morris, J. (2011). A great place to grow older: a case study of how Manchester is developing an age-friendly city. Working with older people, 15(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.5042/wwop.2011.0119

Majón-Valpuesta, D. M. (2020). Nuevos horizontes de la participación social en la vejez: las voces de la generación baby boom. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Sevilla y Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Majón-Valpuesta, D., Pérez-Salanova, M., Ramos, P. y Haye, A. (2022). La creación de entornos amigables: desafíos para la participación social de las personas mayores. Enfoques transdisciplinarios sobre el envejecimiento y la agenda 2030. Vol. I. Bolivia: Instituto Superior Bolivariano en Tecnología (publicación en prensa).

Majón-Valpuesta, D., Pérez-Salanova, M., Ramos, P. y Molina, A. H. (2021). Agencia y participación en la vejez de la generación baby boom: reclamación de espacios alternativos. Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social, 21(1), 2696.

Manchester City Council (2016). Age-Friendly Manchester work plan 2016-2017. https://secure.manchester.gov.uk/info/200091/older_people/7116/our_agefriendly_work/3

Manchester City Council (2017). Manchester: A Great Place to Grow Older 2017-2021, 2nd edition. https://manchestercommunitycentral.org/news/launching-manchester-great-place-grow-older-2017-2021

Martínez, M. S. (2007). La evaluación de los programas intergeneracionales (No. 21003). Imserso.

Menec, V. y Brown, C. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to becoming Age-Friendly: A review. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1528116

Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G. y Eagles, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 30(3), 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237

Morales, E. y Rebollo, O. (2014). Potencialidades y límites de la acción comunitaria como estrategia empoderadora en el contexto actual de crisis. Revista de Treball Social, 203, 9-22.

Murtagh, B., Cleland, C., Ferguson, S., Ellis, G., Hunter, R., Rodriguez, C. R., Becker, L. A., Hino, A. A. F. y Reis, R. S. (2021). Age-friendly cities, knowledge and urban restructuring. International Planning Studies, 0(0), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1920374

Naciones Unidas (2013). Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales de las Naciones Unidas, División de Población. World population ageing 2013. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeingReport2013. pdf

—(2019). World population ageing 2019. Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales. https://www.un.org/development/desa/es/news/population/world-population-prospects-2019.html

Neville, S., Napier, S., Shannon, K. y Adams, J. (2021). Beginning on an age-friendly journey: Barriers to implementing age-friendly initiatives. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 40(4), e287-e293. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12930

Ng, S. I., Lim, X. J. y Hsu, H. C. (2021). The Importance of Age-Friendly City on Older People’s Continuity and Life Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147252

Niedzwiedz, C. L., Richardson, E. A., Tunstall, H., Shortt, N. K., Mitchell, R. J. y Pearce, J. R. (2016). The relationship between wealth and loneliness among older people across Europe: Is social participation protective? Preventive Medicine, 91, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ypmed.2016.07.016

Nierboer, A. P. y Cramm, J. M. (2018). Age-Friendly Communities Matter for Older People’s Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2405-2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9923-5

Noordzij, J. M., Beenackers, M. A., Roux, A. V. D. y Van Lenthe, F. J. (2019). Age-friendly cities: Challenges for future research. World Health Organization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(6), 436-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.224865

Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (2002). Envejecimiento activo: un marco político (Pedro Regalado, trad.). Revista Española Geriátrica y Gerontológica, 37(52), 74-105.

—(2007). Ciudades Globales Amigables con los Mayores: Una Guía.

—(2018). La Red Mundial de Ciudades y Comunidades Adaptadas a las Personas Mayores: revisar el último decenio y mirar con optimismo hacia el siguiente. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/278981

—(2020). Medición del grado de adaptación de las ciudades a las personas mayores-OPS/OMS | Organización Panamericana de la Salud. https://www.paho.

org/es/documentos/medi­cion-grado-adaptacion-ciudades-personas-mayores

—(2021). About the Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities. https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/who-network/

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z. y Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636

Pedell, S., Borda, A., Keirnan, A. y Aimers, N. (2021). Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010325

Pérez, J. y Abellán, A. (2018). Envejecimiento demográfico y vejez en España. En Envejecimiento de la población, familia y calidad de vida en la vejez, Panorama social, nº 28 (pp. 11-48). Madrid: Funcas. https://www.funcas.es/revista/envejecimiento-de-la-poblacion-familia-y-calidad-de-vida-en-la-vejez-enero-2019/

Pérez-Salanova, M. (2002). La participación de las personas mayores: apuntes para una agenda de intervenciones gerontológicas. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 45, 21-32.

—(2009). Reflexionando sobre la autonomía y la longevidad. En Autonomía y dependencia en la vejez. Cuadernos de la Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas 16. Barcelona: Fundació Víctor Grífols i Lucas. https://www.fundaciogrifols.org/documents/4662337/4688831/cuaderno16.pdf/2f29e074-4dee-4b5b-bca2-9dfdb11599c7

Pérez-Salanova, M. y Verdaguer, M. (2018). How to involve seniors experiencing a loss of functional autonomy? The case of Barcelona. Retraite et societe, 1, 61-81.

Petretto, D. R., Pili, R., Gaviano, L., López, C. M. y Zuddas, C. (2016). Envejecimiento activo y de éxito o saludable: una breve historia de modelos conceptuales. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 51(4), 229-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2015.10.003

Phillipson, C. (2010). Ageing and urban society: growing old in the ‘century of the city’. En C. Phillipson y D. Dannefer (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology (pp. 597-606), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,

—(2018). Developing age-friendly work in the twenty-first century: new challenges and agendas. Working with Older People, 22(1), 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/wwop-12-2017-0037

Phillipson, C. y Grenier, A. (2021). Urbanization and Ageing: Ageism, Inequality, and the Future of Age-Friendly Cities. University of Toronto Quarterly, 90(2), 225-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/utq.90.2.11

Pinto-Molina, M. (1992). El resumen documental: principios y métodos. Madrid: Pirámide.

Plouffe, L. A., Garon, S., Brownoff, J., Eve, D., Foucault, M. L., Lawrence, R., Lessard-Beaupré, J.-P. y Toews, V. (2013). Advancing Age-Friendly Communities in Canada. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 68/69, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388

Plouffe, L. A. y Kalache, A. (2011). Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.001

Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A., Przywojska, J. y Wiktorowicz, J. (2020). Smart and age-friendly communities in Poland. An Analysis of Institutional and Individual Conditions for a New Concept of Smart Development of Ageing Communities. Energies, 13(9), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092268

Polivka, L. (2011). Neoliberalism and postmodern cultures of aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464810385919

Raymond, É. (2019). The challenge of inclusion for older people with impairments: Insights from a stigma-based analysis. Journal of Aging Studies, 49, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaging.2019.03.001

Raymond, É. y Grenier, A. (2016). La participation sociale des aînés ayant des incapacités: un photoroman pour passer de la marge à l’inclusion. Service Social, 62(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/107202/1038581ar

Raymond, É., Grenier, A. y Hanley, J. (2014). Community participation of older adults with disabilities. Journal of Community y Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2173

Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T. y Phillipson, C. (2017). Involving Older Residents in Age-Friendly Developments: From Information to Coproduction Mechanisms Involving Older Residents in Age-Friendly Developments. Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 31(2), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309932

—(2021). Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Eleven Case Studies from around the World. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010133

Repetti, M. y Calasanti, T. (2018). ‘Since I retired, I can take things as they come. For example, the laundry’: Gender, class and freedom in retirement in Switzerland. Ageing & Society, 38(8), 1556-1580. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0144686X17000174

Reuter, A., Liddle, J. y Scharf, T. (2020). Digitalising the Age-Friendly City: Insights from Participatory Action Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218281

Ronzi, S., Orton, L., Buckner, S., Bruce, N. y Pope, D. (2020). How is Respect and Social Inclusion Conceptualised by Older Adults in an Aspiring Age-Friendly City? A Photovoice Study in the North-West of England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9246. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249246

Russell, E., Skinner, M. W. y Fowler, K. (2019). Emergent Challenges and Opportunities to Sustaining Age-friendly Initiatives: Qualitative Findings from a Canadian Age-friendly Funding Program. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 0(0), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1636595

Sánchez-González, D., Rojo-Pérez, F., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, V. y Fernández-Mayoralas, G. (2020). Environmental and Psychosocial Interventions in Age-Friendly Communities and Active Ageing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228305

Sandoval, C. (1996). Investigación Cualitativa. Bogotá: ICFES.

Savaya, R. y Spiro, S. E. (2011). Predictors of sustainability of social programs». American Journal of Evaluation, 33(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011408066

Savio, L., Bosia, D., Thiebat, F. y Zhang, Y. (2017). Age-friendly cities: Spazio pubblico e spazio privato. Techne, 14, 319-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/Techne-20834

Scharlach, A. E. y Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing & Society, 33(1), 110-136.

Schneider, B. y Mccoy, L. (2018). Serious leisure, play and the construction of community among older adult square dancers. Activities, Adaptation y Aging, 42(1), 54-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2017.1376178

Steels, S. (2015). Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review. Cities, 45-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004

Subirats, J. (2018). Una concepción del envejecimiento abierta e inclusiva. Edad y ciudadanía. Aula Abierta, 47(1), 13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17811/rifie.47.1.2018.13-20

Sun, Y., Chao, T., Woo, J. y Au, D. W. H. (2017). An institutional perspective of «Glocalization» in two Asian tigers: The «Structure À Agent À Strategy» of building an age-friendly city. Habitat International, 59, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.013

The Family Watch (TFW) (2013). Informe TFW 2013- 2. El papel de la familia en el envejecimiento activo. Madrid: Instituto Internacional de estudios sobre la familia.

Thissen, F. y Droogleever-Fortuijn, J. (2021). ‘The village as a coat’; changes in the person-environment fit for older people in a rural area in The Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.07.001

Tiraphat, S., Peltzar, K., Thamma-Aphiphol, K. y Suthisukon, K. (2017). The role of age-friendly environments on quality of life among Thai older adults. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(3), 282.

Torku, A., Chan, A. P. C. y Yung, E. H. K. (2020). Implementation of age-friendly initiatives in smart cities: Probing the barriers through a systematic review. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(3), 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2020-0008

Torku, A., Chan, A. P. C. y Yung, E. H. K. (2021). Age-friendly cities and communities: A review and future directions. Ageing & Society, 41(10), 2242-2279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000239

Trentham, B. L y Neysmith, S. M. (2018). Exercising senior citizenship in an ageist society through participatory action research: A critical occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(2), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1402809

United Nations, DESA, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. http://population.un.org/wpp/

Van der Meer, M. (2006). Productivity among older people in The Netherlands: variations by gender and the socio-spatial context in 2002-03. Ageing & Society, 26(6), 901-923. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0600523X

Van Dijk, T. (1978). La ciencia del texto: un enfoque interdisciplinario. Barcelona: Paidos.

Van Hoof, J., Dikken, J., Buttigieg, S. C., Van Den Hoven, R. F. M., Kroon, N, E. y Marston, H. R. (2020). Age-friendly cities in the Netherlands: An explorative study of facilitators and hindrances in the built environment and ageism in design. Indoor and Built Environment, 29(3), 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19857216

Van Hoof, J. y Marston, H. R. (2021). Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041644

Van Hoof, J., Marston, H. R., Kazak, J. K. y Buffel, T. (2021). Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and Environment, 199, 107922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922

Vasilachis, I. (2006). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Vila i Mancebo, A., Rodriguez, P. y Dabbagh, V. (2019). Derechos y deberes de las personas mayores en situación de dependencia y su ejercicio en la vida cotidiana. Estudios de la Fundación Pilares para la autonomía personal, nº 6. https://www.fundacionpilares.org/docs/publicaciones/fpilares-estudio06-derechosDeberesPersonasMayores-2019.pdf

Villegas, M. y González, F. (2011). La investigación cualitativa de la vida cotidiana. Medio para la construcción de conocimiento sobre lo social a partir de lo individual. Psicoperspectivas, 10(2), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol10-Issue2-fulltext-147

Walker, A. (2009). Commentary: «The emergence and application of active aging in Europe». Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420802529986

Woo, J.-M. y Choi, M. (2020). Why and How Have Korean Cities Embraced the World Health Organization’s Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Model? Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 0(0), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1707057

Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Fisher, J., Makita, M., Lawthom, R. y Murray, M. (2021). Constructing and negotiating social participation in old age: Experiences of older adults living in urban environments in the United Kingdom. Ageing and Society, 41(6), 1398-1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19001569

Yarker, S. (2019). Social Infrastructure: How shared spaces make communities work. Report for Ambition for Ageing.

Zanwar, P., Kim, J., Kim, J., Manser, M., Ham, Y., Chasparu, T. y Ahn, C. R. (2021). Use of Connected Technologies to Assess Barriers and Stressors for Age and Disability-Friendly Communities. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.578832

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: psychological, organiza­tional and community levels of analysis. En J. Rappaport y E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43-63). Nueva York: Academic/Plenum.

Zúñiga, M., Buffel, T. y Arrieta, F. (2021). Analysing Co-creation and Co-production Initiatives for the Development of Age-friendly Strategies: Learning from the Three Capital Cities in the Basque Autonomous Region. Social Policy and Society, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000282

Zúñiga, M., Salabarría, E. y Arrieta, F. (2019). An analysis of the role of communities in care systems co-created with older people co-created with older people. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1799-1818. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648699